| Ergebnis (50 % = 216,0 MP) |
|---|
| Rang | Nr. | Paar | MP | % | CP |
|---|
| 1. | 17 | Fr. Dammann – Hr. Dammann | 267,0 | 61,81 | 26 |
| 2. | 11 | Fr. Grabowski – Fr. Kleensang | 255,0 | 59,03 | 20 |
| 3. | 4 | Fr. Jensen – Hr. Dr. Jensen | 251,0 | 58,10 | 15 |
| 4. | 12 | Fr. Stürmer – Hr. Thun | 238,0 | 55,09 | 11 |
| 5. | 2 | Fr. Dyczek – Fr. Forck | 228,0 | 52,78 | 8 |
| 6.-7. | 1 | Fr. Kohnert-Koller – Fr. Milz | 227,0 | 52,55 | 5 |
| 6.-7. | 5 | Fr. Häggmark – Fr. Naab-Fricke | 227,0 | 52,55 | 5 |
| 8. | 13 | Fr. Pein – Fr. Stridde | 225,0 | 52,08 | |
| 9. | 9 | Fr. Schröter – Fr. Thun | 224,0 | 51,85 | |
| 10. | 15 | Fr. Scheinert – Hr. Scheinert | 221,0 | 51,16 | |
| 11. | 19 | Fr. Splanemann – Fr. Walberg | 218,0 | 50,46 | |
| 12. | 20 | Fr. Fuhrmann – Hr. Fuhrmann | 213,0 | 49,31 | |
| 13. | 3 | Fr. Kaschani – Fr. Zurek | 211,0 | 48,84 | |
| 14. | 6 | Fr. Salzmann – Hr. Pein | 203,0 | 46,99 | |
| 15. | 16 | Fr. Kreutzer – Fr. I. Schramm | 202,0 | 46,76 | |
| 16.-17. | 18 | Fr. Baum – Fr. R. Meyer | 201,0 | 46,53 | |
| 16.-17. | 7 | Fr. Dr. Schemmel – Fr. Schultze | 201,0 | 46,53 | |
| 18. | 14 | Fr. Bonde – Hr. Bonde | 197,0 | 45,60 | |
| 19. | 10 | Fr. Ehrke – Fr. Haupthoff | 186,0 | 43,06 | |
| 20. | 8 | Fr. Renken-Beyersdorff – Fr. Schneider | 125,0 | 28,94 | |