Ergebnis (50 % = 192,0 MP) |
---|
Rang | Nr. | Paar | MP | % | CP |
---|
1.-2. | 8 | Fr. Forck – Fr. Jenatz | 235,0 | 61,20 | 21 |
1.-2. | 2 | Fr. Bandholz – Fr. Bräuer | 235,0 | 61,20 | 21 |
3. | 13 | Fr. Splanemann – Fr. Weiß | 228,0 | 59,38 | 14 |
4. | 12 | Fr. Pein – Hr. Otto | 223,0 | 58,07 | 10 |
5. | 6 | Fr. Haupthoff – Hr. Bräuer | 221,0 | 57,55 | 8 |
6. | 1 | Fr. Anheier – Fr. Brachmann | 205,0 | 53,39 | 6 |
7. | 17 | Fr. Tantau – Fr. Walberg | 197,0 | 51,30 | |
8. | 9 | Fr. Hahn – Fr. Heller-Hielscher | 196,0 | 51,04 | |
9. | 16 | Hr. H. Baumann – Hr. Pein | 193,0 | 50,26 | |
10. | 4 | Fr. Becker – Fr. Roll | 192,0 | 50,00 | |
11.-12. | 15 | Fr. Preuß – Hr. Reiff | 186,0 | 48,44 | |
11.-12. | 11 | Fr. Langner – Hr. Fuhrmann | 186,0 | 48,44 | |
13. | 3 | Fr. M. Baumann – Fr. G. Pein | 185,0 | 48,18 | |
14. | 10 | Fr. Milz – Hr. Lebes | 176,0 | 45,83 | |
15. | 14 | Fr. von Bergner – Fr. Frearks-Szopieray | 172,0 | 44,79 | |
16. | 7 | Fr. Bremert – Hr. von Bergner | 158,0 | 41,15 | |
17. | 5 | Fr. Baumann – Hr. Langner | 138,0 | 35,94 | |
18. | 18 | Fr. Otto – Fr. Würger | 130,0 | 33,85 | |