| Ergebnis (50 % = 182,0 MP) |
|---|
| Rang | Nr. | Paar | MP | % | CP |
|---|
| 1. | 5 | Fr. Schröter – Hr. Dr. Jensen | 235,0 | 64,56 | 22 |
| 2. | 8 | Fr. Fuhrmann – Hr. Fuhrmann | 210,0 | 57,69 | 17 |
| 3. | 3 | Fr. Jensen – Fr. Pein | 205,0 | 56,32 | 12 |
| 4.-5. | 10 | Fr. Revenstorff – Hr. Borchardt | 199,0 | 54,67 | 8 |
| 4.-5. | 14 | Fr. Vohland – Hr. Dr. Vohland | 199,0 | 54,67 | 8 |
| 6. | 9 | Fr. Kohnert-Koller – Fr. Milz | 198,0 | 54,40 | 5 |
| 7. | 16 | Fr. Hoh – Hr. Hoh | 193,0 | 53,02 | |
| 8. | 6 | Fr. Tilse – Hr. Frederiksen | 190,0 | 52,20 | |
| 9. | 15 | Fr. Dyczek – Fr. Kaschani | 177,0 | 48,63 | |
| 10. | 13 | Fr. Brandt – Fr. Seestädt | 174,0 | 47,80 | |
| 11. | 11 | Fr. Stephan – Hr. Stephan | 173,0 | 47,53 | |
| 12. | 4 | Fr. Frederiksen – Fr. Stridde | 167,0 | 45,88 | |
| 13. | 12 | Fr. Häggmark – Hr. Kruse | 160,0 | 43,96 | |
| 14. | 1 | Fr. Renken-Beyersdorff – Fr. Stürmer | 156,0 | 42,86 | |
| 15. | 7 | Fr. Kleensang – Fr. Sändig | 152,0 | 41,76 | |
| 16. | 2 | Fr. Schmoelder – Fr. Zurek | 124,0 | 34,07 | |