| Ergebnis (50 % = 182,0 MP) |
|---|
| Rang | Nr. | Paar | MP | % | CP |
|---|
| 1. | 4 | Fr. Häggmark – Fr. Naab-Fricke | 205,0 | 56,32 | 22 |
| 2. | 15 | Fr. Dyczek – Hr. Kruse | 202,0 | 55,49 | 17 |
| 3.-4. | 7 | Hr. Pein – Hr. Thun | 201,0 | 55,22 | 11 |
| 3.-4. | 3 | Fr. Grabowski – Fr. Kleensang | 201,0 | 55,22 | 11 |
| 5. | 12 | Fr. Pein – Fr. Volkmann | 198,0 | 54,40 | 7 |
| 6. | 16 | Fr. Hoh – Hr. Hoh | 193,0 | 53,02 | 5 |
| 7. | 11 | Fr. Brandt – Fr. Seestädt | 189,0 | 51,92 | |
| 8.-9. | 2 | Fr. Stephan – Hr. Stephan | 182,0 | 50,00 | |
| 8.-9. | 1 | Fr. Kaschani – Fr. Schmoelder | 182,0 | 50,00 | |
| 10. | 14 | Fr. Vohland – Hr. Dr. Vohland | 181,0 | 49,73 | |
| 11. | 9 | Fr. Renken-Beyersdorff – Fr. Schneider | 180,0 | 49,45 | |
| 12. | 5 | Fr. Saß – Fr. Schröter | 171,0 | 46,98 | |
| 13. | 13 | Fr. I. Schramm – Hr. Schneider | 160,0 | 43,96 | |
| 14. | 6 | Fr. Sändig – Fr. Tilse | 158,0 | 43,41 | |
| 15. | 10 | Fr. Forck – Fr. Thun | 156,0 | 42,86 | |
| 16. | 8 | Fr. Kohnert-Koller – Fr. Milz | 153,0 | 42,03 | |