| Ergebnis (50 % = 182,0 MP) |
|---|
| Rang | Nr. | Paar | MP | % | CP |
|---|
| 1. | 16 | Fr. Fuhrmann – Fr. Hammer | 223,0 | 61,26 | 22 |
| 2. | 5 | Fr. H. Schneider – Hr. Otto | 216,0 | 59,34 | 17 |
| 3. | 14 | Fr. Jensen – Hr. Dr. Jensen | 213,0 | 58,52 | 12 |
| 4. | 6 | Fr. Kaschani – Fr. Schneider | 206,0 | 56,59 | 9 |
| 5. | 9 | Fr. Pein – Hr. Frederiksen | 203,0 | 55,77 | 7 |
| 6. | 10 | Fr. Revenstorff – Hr. Borchardt | 192,0 | 52,75 | 5 |
| 7. | 13 | Fr. Bräuer – Hr. Bräuer | 190,0 | 52,20 | |
| 8. | 1 | Fr. Kohnert-Koller – Fr. Milz | 188,0 | 51,65 | |
| 9. | 8 | Fr. Grabowski – Fr. Kleensang | 185,0 | 50,82 | |
| 10. | 15 | Fr. Häggmark – Hr. Kruse | 175,0 | 48,08 | |
| 11. | 2 | Fr. Schmoelder – Fr. Zurek | 171,0 | 46,98 | |
| 12. | 7 | Fr. Saß – Fr. Schröter | 167,0 | 45,88 | |
| 13. | 11 | Fr. Bandholz – Hr. Lebes | 165,0 | 45,33 | |
| 14. | 3 | Fr. Kuhlmann – Fr. Schlusnus | 157,0 | 43,13 | |
| 15. | 12 | Fr. Brandt – Fr. Seestädt | 153,0 | 42,03 | |
| 16. | 4 | Fr. I. Schramm – Hr. Schneider | 108,0 | 29,67 | |